Arguments
A.
IN Granting Summary Judgment, the
District
Court Erred By Making Findings
of
Fact Concerning Contested Issues, and Compounded that Error by Disregarding
All
of
the Evidence that Strongly Suggested
that
the City’s Stated Reasons were
Pretextual
and Applied Exclusively to
Plaintiffs
But not to Similarly-Situated
Housing
Providers
16
B.
Genuine Issues of Material Fact Exist
as to Whether the City
Violated the
Fair Housing Act and the
Americans
With Disabilities Act,
Thereby
Precluding Summary Judgment
24
1. Genuine Issues of Fact Exist AS TO
the City’s
Discriminatory
Intent 26
2.
Genuine Issues of Fact Exist as to
Whether the City’s
Enforcement
of the Boarding House
Prohibition
Has a Disparate Impact on
Plaintiffs
36
3.
Genuine Issues of Fact Exist as to
whether the City Violated
the
Fair Housing Act and the
Americans
With Disabilities
to Provide a Reasonable Accommodation to Plaintiffs
41
c.
Genuine
Issues of Fact Exist as
to Whether Defendants violated
the Equal Protection Clauses of the
Federal and Florida Constitution.
46
D.
GENUINE ISSUES OF FACT EXIST AS TO
WHETHER THE CITY VIOLATED
PLAINTIFFS’ DUE PROCESS RIGHTS
48
Conclusion
49
Certificate
of Compliance
50
Certificate
of Service
51
|